In all of these categories, the film was eclipsed by The Bridge on the River Kwai, which won seven Academy Awards that year. Fonda, who had received his first Oscar nomination for Best Actor The Grapes of Wrathwas not nominated for his acting. But as producer, he would have received the Oscar had the film won the Best Picture award.
More Essay Examples on Trial Rubric The third juror was the angry father and was a key task role and self-centered role. He played a significant role for the opposing side to the architect and turned the entire discussion into a win or lose situation.
The stockbroker was the rich wall street guy and played a self-centered role. He was rather quiet and, in regards to looking at the evidence, was just like the angry father.
The former gang member played a maintenance role and brought the criminal experience into the discussion. His knowledge of wielding a knife helped disprove that the accused stabbed his father in a downward angle.
The house painter was a self-centered and a maintenance role. Once he changed his vote he began to defend the weaker members, who had switched to not-guilty, from the angry father.
He was the first person to say not-guilty and started the entire discussion which ultimately made everyone change their vote to not-guilty.
The ninth juror, the wise elderly man, played a maintenance role. At one point in the movie the architect decides that after a vote he would say guilty if the rest of the jury still voted guilty. The tenth juror, the garage owner, was a self-centered bigot and seemed to stick to the fact that the accused was guilty because of his race or social level.
After a while it seemed that the race of the accused was the only grounds that he had to argue on. The watchmaker was a successful immigrant who had come to New York to be a watch maker. When it came to true consensus, I believe that the jury came to true consensus.
But after some reflection on it, I believe that the final few not-guilty votes were satisfied. The architect did an excellent job of convincing everyone completely that the accused was not-guilty. By reaching true consensus the jury learned much about the justice system and some even learned life lessons that they will not forget.
Choose Type of service.Jun 30, · FilmStruck guides viewers through its catalog in part by presenting themed collections with names like “Italian Neo-Realism,” “Female Friendships,” “Cinematography by Néstor Almendros.
12 Angry Men is a American courtroom drama film adapted from a teleplay of the same name by Reginald Rose. Written and co-produced by Rose himself and directed by Sidney Lumet, this trial film tells the story of a jury made up of 12 men as they deliberate the conviction or acquittal of a defendant on the basis of reasonable doubt, forcing the jurors to question their morals and rutadeltambor.comng: Henry Fonda, Lee J.
Cobb, Ed Begley, E. G. Marshall, Jack Warden. 目次に戻る。. III.
項目別概要整理. 事件の概要. l ニューヨーク市内に於ける 16 歳のプエルトリコ少年（被告人：⊿）による父親殺害事件。 スラム育ちの⊿は 9 歳のときに母親を失い、父親が偽造罪で服役中の一年半の間には里子に出され、酷い 16 年間を送って来た (Rose at 9, DVD at ch) 。. % FREE Papers on 12 angry men essay. Sample topics, paragraph introduction help, research & more.
Class , high school & college.
- Sidney lumet 12 angry men; 12 Angry Men Essay Examples. Tip: Use our Essay Rewriter to automatically rewrite any essay and remove plagiarism. 12 Angry Men Analysis 12 Angry Men is a movie, directed by Sidney Lumet, about twelve jurors who are deliberating a murder trial. An 18 year old has been accused of murdering his father and the jury has retired to determine his fate.
12 Angry Men Analysis Essay - Part 2. 12 Angry Men is a movie, directed by Sidney Lumet, about twelve jurors who are deliberating a murder trial - 12 Angry Men Analysis Essay introduction. An 18 year old has been accused of murdering his father and the jury has retired to determine his fate.